Aleksandr Sobyanin, Vladimir Poltoradnev and Vladimir Timoshkin with a supporting group near the courthouse. November, 2023.

Unjust Verdicts

The Appeal Upholds Fines for Three Jehovah's Witnesses From Solikamsk

Perm Territory

On November 16, 2023, the Judicial Collegium of the Perm Territory Court approved the main part of the verdict against Vladimir Poltoradnev, Vladimir Timoshkin and Aleksandr Sobyanin. Believers will have to pay fines ranging from 494,000 rubles to 638,000 rubles. At the same time, the court overturned the decision to collect lawyer's fees from them and lifted the arrest from Sobyanin's car.

In August 2023, the court found the believers guilty of organizing the activities of an extremist organization for participating in religious meetings and "discussing with followers of [the religion of Jehovah's Witnesses] issues and topics of a religious nature."

In appeals against the verdict, those convicted for their faith drew attention to the fact that all their actions were completely peaceful and that they did not do anything related to extremism. "The court considered the usual doctrinal practice of the religion of Jehovah's Witnesses not prohibited by law (gathering together for worship to God, singing religious songs, turning to God in prayer, reading the Holy Scriptures and unprohibited religious publications, carrying out preaching activities, etc.) prohibited activities, which contradicts the provisions of Article 28 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation," Vladimir Poltoradnev said in his complaint.

The believers drew the court's attention to the fact that according to to the appellate ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of June 17, 2017, adopted in the case of the liquidation of legal entities of Jehovah's Witnesses, "the court of first instance did not assess the legality of the religious beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses and the ways in which they were expressed," but only assessed the actions of specific legal entities. "Recognition of a legal entity as extremist is not tantamount to imposing a ban on a religious denomination with its inherent beliefs, spiritual terminology, the order of worship," says one of the complaints of believers.

Vladimir Poltoradnev, Vladimir Timoshkin and Aleksandr Sobyanin still insist on their innocence and can appeal the decisions of the courts in cassation.

The case of Poltoradnev and Others in Solikamsk

Case History
In July 2020, the Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee for the Perm Territory opened a criminal case against Vladimir Poltoradnev, Alexander Sobyanin and Vladimir Timoshkin from Solikamsk. By that time, law enforcement officers had been spying on them for a long time. After searches and interrogations, three believers ended up in a temporary detention facility. Then Sobyanin was released under a ban on certain actions, and Poltoradnev and Timoshkin were placed under house arrest for 2 and 3 months, respectively. Later, the measure of restraint of the latter was also changed to a ban on certain actions. After the investigation was repeatedly suspended and resumed, the case went to court in April 2023. Already in August, the judge found the believers guilty and fined: Alexander Sobyanin for 494 thousand rubles, Vladimir Poltoradnev for 638 thousand rubles and Vladimir Timoshkin for 512 thousand rubles. An appeal in November 2023 upheld the main part of the sentence, slightly mitigating the additional punishment.
Timeline

Persons in case

Criminal case

Region:
Perm Territory
Locality:
Solikamsk
Suspected of:
"directly participated in religious meetings ... discussed with his followers issues and topics of a religious nature" (from the decision to prosecute as an accused)
Court case number:
12002570024000055
Initiated:
July 27, 2020
Current case stage:
The verdict entered into force
Investigating:
Solikamsk Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Perm Territory
Articles of Criminal Code of Russian Federation:
282.2 (1)
Court case number:
1-180/2023
Court of First Instance:
Соликамский городской суд Пермского края
Judge of the Court of First Instance:
Евгений Сергеев
Case History