Case of Voronchikhin and Others in Simferopol

Case History

In November 2022, mass searches of believers took place in the Simferopol district of Crimea, as a result of which a criminal case was initiated. Aleksandr Voronchikhin was interrogated and a recognizance agreement was taken from him. The Investigative Committee accused him of organizing the activity of an extremist organization, calling peaceful meetings for worship a crime. In August 2023, new searches took place in Armyansk, Simferopol and Saki, including at the homes of Voronchikhin’s son-in-law, Dmitry Zakharevich. He, as well as Aleksandr Kopylets, Ekaterina Demidova and several other Jehovah’s Witnesses became suspects in the case. Later, the cases of four believers were separated from their case into separate proceedings. Zakharevich and Kopylets spent more than 8 months under house arrest, after which they were released on their own recognizance. In November 2023, the case went to court, but was later returned to the prosecutor. After 7 months, the retrial of the case in court began.

  • #

    Investigator of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation V.A. Novikov initiates a criminal case against several Jehovah's Witnesses from Crimea. According to the investigation, they committed "active actions of an organizational nature, expressed in the organization of propaganda meetings, at which discussions were held on the texts and religious provisions of Jehovah's Witnesses."

  • #
  • #

    Aleksandr Voronchikhin and Dmitriy Zakharevich are filing an appeal against the court's decision to allow a search of their home.

  • #

    The case against Victor Mani is separated into a separate proceeding, and later new defendants appear in it.

  • #

    In three cities of Crimea — Armyansk, Simferopol and Saki — searches are being conducted in 9 houses of believers.

    Investigator Novikov involves Dmitry Zakharevich and Alexander Kopylets as defendants in the criminal case.

  • #

    Zakharevich and Kopylets were placed under house arrest.

    Several other Jehovah's Witnesses are being searched.

  • #

    The case is submitted to the Simferopol District Court for consideration.

  • #

    The measure of restraint in the form of house arrest for Dmitry Zakharevich and Alexander Kopylets is extended until December 11, 2023. Alexander Voronchikhin and Ekaterina Demidova were chosen as a preventive measure in the form of a written undertaking not to leave and proper behavior.

  • #

    Judge Olga Chepil decides to return the case to the prosecutor "to remove obstacles to its consideration by the court."

  • #

    The Supreme Court of the Republic of Crimea makes a decision on the appeal of the prosecutor and the appeal of the defender against the decision of the Simferopol District Court to return the criminal case to the prosecutor, initiated by the same court. The appeal upheld this ruling. The case must be returned to the prosecutor in order to remove obstacles to its consideration.

    The house arrest of A. Kopylets and D. Zakharevich has been extended until April 26, 2024.

  • #

    Senior investigator A. Rudoy changes the measure of restraint for Aleksandr Kopylets and Dmitry Zakharevich to a recognizance not to leave and proper behavior.

  • #

    Oleksandr Kopylets is charged with a new edition. The believer does not admit his guilt. "I do not agree with the charges, since I have never carried out, organized or continued extremist activities," he said.

  • #

    Oleksandr Kopylets is notified of the completion of the investigation.

  • #

    The case of the believers is submitted to the Simferopol District Court. It will be considered by judge Aleksandr Serdyuk.

  • #

    Witnesses for the prosecution are being interrogated - law enforcement officers Yatsenko and Latyshev.

    Yatsenko tells the court about the operational-search measures against Jehovah's Witnesses in Crimea, carried out since 2017 together with the FSB: wiretapping of believers' telephone conversations, monitoring them, and so on.

    During the interrogation, the judge instructs Yatsenko several times to base his testimony only on facts, not on guesses. For example, in his speech, Yatsenko interprets the concept of political neutrality as "non-recognition of the authorities," and calls a meeting of several people at home a gathering of an extremist organization. However, he cannot say what exactly happened at the meetings of Jehovah's Witnesses, because he does not remember.

    The second witness, Latyshev, answered the lawyer's questions about whether the defendants put their faith above the laws [of the Russian Federation], above any other faith. Is this somehow recorded in the case file? He replies that he can't say anything. According to him, the unlawful actions of the defendants consisted in preparing and turning on a video conference, with the help of which a liturgical meeting was held.

    The defense asks Latyshev if he knew that according to the Plenum of the Supreme Court of October 28, 2021, Jehovah's Witnesses can perform regular meetings for worship or other rites and gather together. The witness replies, "I won't speak, I don't remember. I haven't read or heard this particular organ."

Back to top